What the World’s Weather (and Farming) May Look Like in 2100

Vern Scott
6 min readAug 29, 2022

The effects of global warming and melting polar ice have already had an impact in terms of extended droughts, more extreme hurricanes and tornadoes, floods and forest fires. Resultant changes in ocean temperatures may affect ocean currents, pushing storms in northern latitudes northward. These changes many push humanity and agriculture similarly northward, populating previously remote regions of Canada, Russia, and elsewhere.

An Estimate of the Distribution of Climate Sensitivity by 2100. Note that Russia and Canada have “modest to moderate” sensitivity, while the US, China, and parts of Middle East rate “moderate to severe”

The rapid acceleration of polar ice melt, and extreme weather events experienced by the world as of late, may demonstrate that global warming is here to stay (and perhaps beyond intervention and blame to some degree). The general runaway effect involves loss of polar ice, loss of solar reflectivity, ocean warming (and possible diminishing of ocean currents) which will push precipitation towards the poles. Together with a predicted 4–8 degree increase in temperatures, look for rainfall to increase (due to higher evaporation rates), some desert areas to expand and agriculture to also move towards the poles by 2100. Since there is much greater land mass in the Northern Hemisphere, look also for previously chilly Canada and Russia to become larger ag and population centers.

The Reasons for Changes in Weather Patterns and Warming

The reasons for higher temperatures by 2100 are relatively simple. Increases in CO2 and Methane are trapping solar heat in our atmosphere, while melting polar ice is reflecting less sunlight, and trapping more. If the situation is not reversed (via some miraculously rapid CO2/Methane reduction or Geoengineering marvel), we may all have to live with this warmer climate, with extended droughts and extreme weather. Actually, what we may be seeing is the final (and rapid) reversal of a process that began 10,000 years ago, when polar ice extended into Europe and the Great Lake States (and the Middle East was actually green and fertile, not the desert we see today). When polar ice recedes, the climate gets hotter and wetter, areas of mid latitudes drier, and the northern latitudes warmer and wetter (much of Canada and Russia have previously been colder and drier). Due to resultant lower temperature differentials between the poles and the equator, we are likely to see a decline in ocean currents (which are driven by this temperature differentials). A lack of ocean currents has the effect of both a) further warming the planet, due to a diminishing of CO2 eating phytoplankton, and b) Pushing atmospheric pressure zones northward, keeping storms from reaching the mid latitudes. We may already be seeing this effect at work, judging from the increased droughts and forest fires in California, Europe, and Australia. Scientists are careful to say there are other factors complicating the relationship between melting ice and rainfall patterns (including the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, El Nino, and possibly orbital effects such as Milankovich Cycles). In fact, scientists concede that weather models are almost impossibly hard to predict with high accuracy (given many overlapping and complicating factors). What follows will be my prediction, based upon generally known and agreed upon phenomenon. (scied.ucar.edu,2019),(greentumble.com,2018),(Kahn,2017),(Kintisch,2017),(Carey,2006)

The Cretaceous Period (144 to 64 million years ago) had no polar ice, a CO2 level of 2,000 ppm, oceans up to 800 ft higher, and temperatures about 15 d F hotter. The dinosaurs thrived, but would humans?

The World 100 Million Years Ago

This is not exactly comforting, but animal life actually thrived during the last great warming period, the Cretaceous Period (roughly 144 to 65 million years ago), when the dinosaurs dominated. There was no polar ice, the equator was blistering hot (averaging in the high 90s F), while even the most northern and southern latitudes were largely frost-free and averaging about 60 degrees F. CO2 in the atmosphere was much higher than it is today (about 2,000 ppm, compared to about 415 ppm), which may give us some hope for survival. Ocean levels were anywhere from 330 to 800 feet higher than today (!) The increase in CO2 was due to a massive decay in vegetative matter, combined with several volcanic events. Though the earth was busy creating the balance of conifers and tropical vegetation that we see today, there were not enough plants to offset this CO2 increase. Nevertheless, animals and plants apparently thrived, although in a much hotter and more humid environment. (Cumo,2022),(Wang,Gao,Ibarra,Wu,Wang,2021),(Britannica.com,n.d.)

What if Cretaceous Conditions Began Happening Again

The year 2100 will likely be a far cry from Cretaceous conditions, but it may be a pretty good hint of things to come. For starters, ocean levels may rise up to seven feet, which may have the effect of major flooding in coastal cities. Temperatures may rise by 4–8 degrees F, which may make deserts hotter and northern climates (again, think Russia and Canada, also Alaska, Greenland, Scandinavia) more hospitable and farmable. Rainfall may also favor these northern climates, making them better places to live and farm. Tropical areas will continue to be tropical, only even hotter and wetter (good for some ag, not so good for other ag, generally inhospitable for humans). (nca2014.globalchange.gov,2014),(Lindsey,2022)

On a hotter planet in 2100, some sort of Biodome may protect us (assuming we don’t have to live with Pauly Shore and Steven Baldwin)

How Will We Adapt:

For this discussion, I will talk primarily about the Northern Hemisphere, since the Southern Hemisphere has so much less farmable/livable land mass (suffice it to say that Australia, South Africa, and Argentina may suffer the same fates as California). Given normal technological growth, we may see both a gradual migration of humanity northward, but also an ability to adapt to these new conditions. Agriculture is already moving towards fruits and vegetables, many of which actually like desert conditions (hotter, drier) and need less water. The “grain belts” currently in places like the Midwest and Ukraine, will surely shift northward into Russia, Canada and elsewhere. Grain may become less important to our diet, as our population may shift away from meat and dairy (and the 40% of grain that feeds that industry). Conifer forests will likely shift northward, yet perhaps shrink substantially. If energy can be produced cheaply and cleanly (think solar, wind, nuclear here), drier areas may continue to be cheap energy producers and thus somewhat livable using artificial climate controls, perhaps in some sort of biodome oases.

Extreme Weather Events:

The tremendous wind-driven events, droughts, floods, forest fires and hotter temperatures will continue as part of a process of rising oceans and some desertification (ultimately, this desertification may be offset by an overall increase in rainfall). What we are seeing now are the changes, and at some point there may not be “floods” (essentially higher oceans levels, since people will move away from the coasts) and “forest fires” (as there may be little left to burn in some places). Since wind often goes with rain, it is believed that winds will also move northward, in more extreme events. In drier areas, wind driven events (in the continental US, for instance) may be ignored like remote Middle East sandstorms, due to decreased population densities. In any case, the population distribution will surely look much different (and much closer to the poles) than it does currently. (Earthjustice.org,2022),(Aronsohn,2021)

Start browsing at the real estate ads in Dawson City Yukon, Nuuk Greenland, and Yekaterinburg Siberia, and start packing your bags!

Other Climate Related Articles by Vern Scott



Vern Scott

Scott lives in the SF Bay Area and writes confidently about Engineering, History, Politics, and Health