Thanks Michael. Hey on another note, as a smart/highly relevant/well spoken Oncologist, you can possibly check in on a thread I have going with another Medium writer Gunnar De Winter re: some apparent reciprocal effects of anti-aging effects and cancer… https://scottvern.medium.com/i-agree-until-we-have-more-information-and-know-the-proper-dose-can-manage-side-effects-rapamycin-b87360c2bac4 and https://www.livescience.com/60825-aging-is-inevitable-according-to-math.html It pretty much goes like this: 1) If you increase telomere lengths (ie with telomerase), you may abet cancer 2) If you increase aging cell apoptosis too much, you may abet cancer (its all as though “aging” may weirdly be a kind of cancer defense at some level? On the other hand, there may be a “balance” where controlling inflammation decreases aging and cancer?) The final thread is…let’s say it 2050 and we’ve conquered cancer and aging, but then we’re no longer a being that adapts to Nature or evolves and our whole species crashes? Do the things that give life also give death, which is ultimately good for humans (and Nature) as a whole? Profound I realize, but your thoughts wise one?